Posted on 23 Dec 2013
The Police Arbitration Tribunal issued its judgment on 20th December 2013 on the Winsor report part 2, see attached. The panel met on 15th November 2013 to consider a failure to reach agreement between the two sides of the Police Negotiation Board, official and staff. The two key issues were;
• Compulsory severance
• Restricted duties
The PAT has wholesale rejected the introduction of compulsory severance for police officers with less than full pensionable service. Clearly this is the best possible outcome for rank and file officers.
Of the three recommendations relating to restricted duties, the Sides only differed on one, recommendation 39. The view put forward by the Official Side on the meaning of restricted duty was accepted, so now the definition and potential pay reduction applies to officers unable to undertake the full range of duties of a police officer. Staff Side remain concerned that this could lead to discrimination for disabled officers.
The tribunal decision now rests with the Home Secretary for ratification in due course.
The PAT judgment along with the opening address (attached) made to PAT on 15 November by Ian Rennie, staff side chief negotiator and General Secretary of the Police Federation of England and Wales, are available to download here:
The Federation Medical Scheme is not an ‘insured scheme’. The scheme is open to serving officers of all ranks, members of support staff and their husband / wife and children under 21..+ details
The latest utilities offers.+ details
The Police Federation mortgage team has been provided with a fund of up to £10 million by one of the top UK building Societies.+ details